Marine Protected Areas Corner

CEP Homepage

wpe1B.jpg (3435 bytes)

wpe1B.jpg (3435 bytes)

US Launches Institute for MPA Training

The Institute for Marine Protected Area Training and Technical Assistance will develop and provide a variety of training and assistance to MPA managers, scientists, fishermen, and other interested parties, primarily from the US. It is created by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and will be located at NOAA's Coastal Services Center in Charleston, South Carolina.

NOAA invites inquiries from students and professionals interested in collaborating with the institute's staff and its partners. More information on the institute and the national MPA Center in general is available on a new website, "Marine Protected Areas of the United States", co-managed by the US Department of Commerce and Department of the Interior. The website's address is http://mpa.gov.

For further information, please contact:
Roger Griffis
NOAA
14th and Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, D.C. 20230
USA
Tel: +1 (202) 482 5034
E-mail: roger.b.griffis@noaa.gov

WB00852_1.GIF (317 bytes) [Top of Page]

Toxin May Be Killing Loggerhead Turtles
(Clearwater, Florida)

Loggerhead sea turtles seem to be affected by a mysterious toxin that works on the central nervous system. This may be the reason for the findings of ill or dead individuals. "It appears they have some neurotransmitter problems related to some type of toxin", said biologist Glenn Harman. Awaiting the results of a necropsy. Only speculations can be made as to the identity, source and precise effect of the toxin. A theory is that the turtles, which eat local jellyfish and build up a tolerance to the toxins, may have consumed an alien jellyfish brought by a ship’s ballast water. There is also the possibility of a bacteria or virus being the cause of the loggerhead turtles disease.

WB00852_1.GIF (317 bytes) [Top of Page]

Financing Mechanisms for MPAs
(
Adapted from MPA NEWS Vol. 2, No. 8 February 2001
http://depts.washington.edu/mpanews/MPA17.htm)

MPA Managers often face the problem of meeting their conservation goals with a budget that is less than needed. Short on funding, conservation programs and visitor services must be limited. Since this situation is far from ideal many working with MPAs are trying hard to find additional sources of funding. By harnessing the economic potential of an MPA they can use that revenue to support the costs of resource protection.

Around the world, MPA practitioners have instituted self-financing programs, and in many cases these programs have played an important role in supporting protected areas.

Tourism is of course one major source of revenue. "Thanks to tourism, the environmental resources available in and around protected areas become, potentially, an extremely valuable economic asset," says Nick Marchesi of Pescares Italia Srl, an Italian consulting firm, that envisions a future in which protected areas will benefit from tourism-based revenue. "Nevertheless, we keep managing them as inexhaustible common goods to which everybody has to be granted free and unconditioned access. Although ethically sound, this management approach is in fact undermining the enormous value of these resources, preventing us from managing them effectively."

But, besides tourism there are other methods that can be used. In Fijii, one project is using bioprospecting as a way to generate cash for area communities while raising awareness of the value of local biodiversity. Bioprospecting involves the collection and testing of biological resources for the purpose of developing new products, often medicines. It is a controversial activity and its potential downsides include the fact that short-term financial benefits from sampling fees are not sustained for very long, and that there is typically little investment in the community in terms of infrastructure. In addition, calculating the magnitude and distribution of eventual profits can be difficult.

The World Conservation Union (IUCN) has published a guidebook to assist protected area managers in identifying and securing appropriate and sustainable finance. Financing Protected Areas: Guidelines for Protected Area Managers provides a step-by-step process for creating business and financial plans, and discusses mechanisms for generating revenue flows. The book is intended to serve as a living document through the associated IUCN website of http://biodiversityeconomics.org/finance/topics-38-00.htm,

The full text of the book is downloadable for free from that site; IUCN will update the book on the site as new material becomes available. In addition, the website offers material not found in the book, including a list of donor organizations by global region, along with links to those donors' websites. The book can also be downloaded from http://wcpa.iucn.org/pubs/publications.html.

WB00852_1.GIF (317 bytes) [Top of Page]

New Book Gives Valuable Lessons on MPA Inventories

New marine protected areas are designated worldwide every year, and to make an analysis of the coverage offered by MPAs is becoming more and more difficult. For managers to assess gaps in habitat protection there is a need to first evaluate the existing MPAs. This can be painstaking in regions where there are dozens, or hundreds of areas designated under different regulatory regimes. Inventories are nevertheless necessary for effective planning, and regional MPA databases are becoming more common.

"Marine Protected Areas and Fishery Closures in British Columbia" is a new book that may offer a useful model for MPA managers interested in executing an inventory of their own. The authors of the book, Glen Jamieson and Joanne Lessard recommends others in the MPA inventory process around the world to contact them who have gone before them, including themselves. "They don’t need to go through the learning pains we did".

There is an accompanying web site (http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/oceans/closure/default.htm) which allows visitors to search more detailed maps of each MPA that was analyzed for the project. This site is to be a living document and will be updated with newer data as they are added to the database.

For more information:
Glen Jamieson or Joanne Lessard
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Pacific Biological Station
Nanaimo, BC V9R 5K6
Canada
Tel: +1 (250) 756 7223
E-mail: jamiesong@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca or lessardjo@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca

WB00852_1.GIF (317 bytes) [Top of Page]

Network to Help Park Managers Cope with Global Changes

The Protected Areas Learning Network (PALN) is a project launched by the World Resources Institute (WRI), the World Conservation Union (IUCN), Conservation International and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). This is an international network to help the world’s protected area managers to anticipate and cope with global changes brought about by climate change, poverty and population growth. It will be web-based, and a place where current information on management issues can be accessed by park managers and scientists.

 

 

 

 

WB01753_.GIF (848 bytes)

Marine Reserves the Best Hope for Ocean Species

There is now compelling scientific evidence that marine reserves conserve both biodiversity and fisheries, and could help to replenish the seas and depleted fish stocks, says a scientific consensus statement signed by 150 of the world's leading marine scientists. The statement was released February 17 at the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting. The statement is the culmination of a three-year, international effort to advance scientific understanding of marine reserves.

"All around the world there are different experiences, but the basic message is the same: marine reserves work, and they work fast," said Jane Lubchenco (Oregon State University, USA), a past president of AAAS and a leader of the three-year effort. "It is no longer a question of whether to set aside fully protected areas in the ocean, but where to establish them."

The declining state of the oceans and the collapse of many fisheries creates a critical need for more effective management of marine biodiversity, populations of exploited species and the overall health of the oceans, marine scientists believe. While MPA's and Marine Sanctuaries have been designated to enhance conservation, they often allow activities such as fishing and mining, whereas marine reserves do not.

The consensus statement recommends that marine resource managers use reserves as a "central management tool" for achieving long-term fishery and conservation benefits. It concludes that networks of reserves, rather than isolated single reserves, will be necessary to buffer against environmental variability and catastrophes.

A research team, based at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (University of California, Santa Barbara), examined the effects of reserves on fish populations. The team's study of more than 100 reserves from around the world indicated that after one to two years of protection, within marine reserves:

  • population densities were on average 91 percent higher than those outside reserves
  • biomass was 192 percent higher
  • average organism size was 31 percent higher
  • species diversity was 23 percent higher

"The results are startling and consistent," said Dr. Robert Warner of the University of California, Santa Barbara. "We now have strong evidence that reserves work. Within and around marine parks, fish population doubles, fish size grows by 30 percent and reproduction triples."

"Furthermore, it all happens within two to four years and it lasts for decades," Warner said.

The size and abundance of exploited species also increases in areas adjacent to reserves, the study found. Reserves serve as natural hatcheries, replenishing populations throughout the region as young fish and other species spill over beyond reserve boundaries.

The consensus statement on marine reserves is available online at the following websites:

http://www.compassonline.org/frame.html
or http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/Consensus

For more information:
Jane Lubchenco, Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. Tel: +1 541 737 5337; E-mail: lubchenj@bcc.orst.edu.

Robert Warner, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. Tel: +1 805 893 2941; E-mail: warner@lifesci.ucsb.edu.

Adapted from Cat Lazaroff, ENS http://ens-news.com/ens/feb2001/2001L-02-22-06.html and MPA News Vol. 2. No. 8 March 2001 http://depts.washington.edu/mpanews/MPA17.htm#Consensus

WB00852_1.GIF (317 bytes) [Top of Page]

Mother Jones Action Atlas for Coral Reefs

That the coral reefs of this planet are in bad shape is no secret. On the web site of Mother Jones there is an Action Atlas, where the regions with coral reefs can be explored on the net. The Atlas makes a list of the particular threats to regions and selected countries, and also provides links to NGOs and activist groups addressing the problems. This Atlas can be found on http://www.motherjones.com/coral_reef/

WB00852_1.GIF (317 bytes)

Coral Bleaching Video Now Available

A short film on coral bleaching and the marine environment was made by biologist and journalist André Maslennikov during an expedition made within The Southern Seychelles Atoll Research Programme 1998. There is a VHS copy of the video for sale, as well as another video made for the Swedish television featuring a report from the expedition, the work performed, coral bleaching and some interviews with the researchers. Both films are 95 US$ including shipping.

If interested in buying copies of these films, please specify the system being used - PAL, NTSC or SECAM and contact:

André Maslennikov
AM Reportage AB
Hagavägen 188
752 63 Uppsala
Sweden
Tel: +46 18 46 34 00
E-mail: maslennikov@swipnet.se

WB00852_1.GIF (317 bytes) [Top of Page]

MPA Perspective: MPA Revenue Generation and the User Fee Option

"MPA Perspective: MPA Revenue Generation and the User Fee Option" By Kreg Lindberg, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia

As illustrated in the recent MPA News article on self-financing (March 2001), user fees like the US$10 dive fee at Bonaire can make important contributions to the funding of MPAs. Nonetheless, there are several conceptual and practical issues facing MPA managers when deciding whether to charge fees. This article briefly discusses some of these issues in the context of user fees at Belizean MPAs.
The article in full can be read online at http://depts.washington.edu/mpanews/MPA18.htm

WB00852_1.GIF (317 bytes) [Top of Page]

MPAs and Tourism: Stakeholders Work to Build a Productive Relationship

For the managers of MPAs it’s quite a task to manage the relationship between tourism and marine protected areas. MPAs are often unique ecosystems which makes them attractive to tourists, for scuba diving, sight seeing and other activities. But, the tourists, can quickly degrade the very resources they’ve come to see if not managed properly.

Divers taught to be conservationists? This is the plan of Angelo Mojetta, who believes that if scuba divers are adequately trained how to minimize the negative impacts they can have on the underwater environment there is no need to restrict them from MPAs. Mojetta, a marine biologist and committee member of the Italian diving equipment marketing association, believes several restrictions to divers in federal Italian reserves are too severe. Many divers are open to the idea of daily or annual limits on the number of divers, and fees. But, if divers were to be educated to be better conservationists, which should be under the reserve authorities attention and not left to diving schools and aquaria, the divers could be transformed from being mere consumers of the sea to be real living resources of the aquatic environment.

Murray Rudd also sees an economic value that can come from linking MPAs and dive tourism. Rudd has researched the potential value of increased grouper size and abundance to the dive tourism industry in the Turks and Caicos Islands. Several respondents to a survey made by Rudd and his co-investigators would be willing to pay an extra US$ 10 or more for a trip featuring an abundance of groupers per dive instead of just one (47 % of the answers). Twenty per cent of the respondents were willing to pay an extra US$ 10 or more to see large grouper instead of small ones. This could prove the economic incentive to introduce no-take-zones if some of the revenue generated from increased dive fees was to go to the fishermen, to compensate them for lost incomes.

Adapted from MPA News, Vol. 2, No. 9
(http://depts.washington.edu/mpanews/MPA18.htm )


CEPNEWS Archive

Last updated: 09 May, 2001

UNEP -- Caribbean Environment Programme
Regional Co-ordinating Unit
14 - 20 Port Royal Street
Kingston, Jamaica, W.I

Tel: 876 922 - 9267
Fax: 876 922 - 9292
Email: uneprcuja@cwjamaica.com
URL: http://www.cep.unep.org/

© 2000 - 2001 UNEP - CAR/RCU