UNEP Logo Appropriate Technology for Sewage Pollution Control in the Wider Caribbean Region

Report Contents
Report in Word Format

Caribbean Environment Programme Technical Report #40 1998 All CEP Technical Reports

Chapter 2.
BACKGROUND

 

GEOGRAPHIC DEFINITION OF WIDER CARIBBEAN REGION

For the purpose of this report, the Wider Caribbean Region includes states and territories within the Caribbean region as defined by the Cartagena Convention.

The WCR is divided into six sub-regions for further reference, as described in the map and list below (UNEP 1994):

 

I. Gulf of Mexico—Cuba, Mexico, and United States (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida)

II. Western Caribbean—Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Panama

III. North-eastern and Central Caribbean—Bahamas, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, and Turks and Caicos Islands

IV. Eastern Caribbean—Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, British Virgin Islands, Dominica, Grenada, Guadaloupe, Martinique, Montserrat, St. Maarten, St. Lucia, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and the U.S. Virgin Islands

V. Southern Caribbean—Colombia, Netherlands Antilles, Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela

VI. Equatorial Atlantic North West—French Guyana, Guyana, and Surinam.

 

WASTEWATER COMPOSITION

Domestic sewage is a significant contributor to marine pollution in the WCR. Domestic sewage originates mostly from households, public facilities, and businesses. For wastes from communities where most homes and businesses have piped water, typical pollutant composition of domestic sewage is as follows:

Total Suspended Solids (TSS)

200-300 mg/L
5-day Biochemical Oxidation Demand (BOD)

200-250 mg/L

Chemical Oxidation Demand (COD) 350-450 mg/L
Total Nitrogen as N 25-60 mg/L
Total Phosphorus as P 5-10 mg/L
Oil and Grease 80-120 mg/L

In unsewered areas, septic tanks are common. Septic tanks accumulate solids known as septage, which must be removed every few years to ensure effective operation of the system. Typical pollutant composition of septage taken to wastewater treatment facilities is as follows:

TSS 10,000-25,000 mg/L
5-day BOD 3,000-5,000 mg/L
COD 25,000-40,000 mg/L
Total Nitrogen as N 200-700 mg/L
Total Phosphorus as P 100-300 mg/L
Oil and Grease 2500-7500 mg/L

Industrial wastewater has a wide range of pollutant concentrations. Oil refinery wastewater produces 70 percent of the entire BOD load in the Caribbean. These wastes are high in BOD, dissolved salts, odour, phenol, and sulphur compounds. Food processing industries, distilleries, and soft drink industries produce about 5 percent of the BOD load in the Caribbean. They are characterised by very high BOD concentration, suspended solids, dissolved solids, variable pH, and a high level of organic matter. Chemical industries produce about 1 percent of the entire BOD load in the WCR. Even though they have low BOD strength, wastewater from chemical industries is important because it is frequently toxic to aquatic organisms at very low concentrations. This toxicity may actually mask assessment of BOD for these wastes by killing the BOD test organisms. Pesticides and insecticides used for agriculture are the primary chemical wastes in the Caribbean. These wastes are high in organic matter and are toxic to bacteria and fish.

Table 2-1 shows typical pollutant characteristics from common industries in the WCR.

 

 

TABLE 2-1.
TYPICAL INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS

 

Industry


BOD Concentration (mg/L)


TSS Concentration (mg/L)


Oil & Grease Concentration (mg/L)



Metals Present


Volatile Compounds Present

Refractory Organics Concentration (mg/L)

Oil Refinery

100 to 300

100 to 250

200 to 3,000

Arsenic, Iron

Sulphides

Phenols
0 to 270

Tanneries

1000-3000

4000-6000

50-850

Chromium 300-1000

Sulphides
Ammonia
100-200

 
Bottling Plant

200 to 6,000

0 to 3,500

       
Distillery, Molasses, or Sugar Factory

600 to 32,000

200 to 30,000

   

Ammonia
5 to 400

 
Food Processing

100 to 7,000

30 to 7,000

       
Paper Factory

250 to 15,000

500 to 100,000

 

Selenium, Zinc

 

Phenols
0 to 800

Chemical Plant

500 to 20,000

1,000 to 170,000

0 to 2,000

Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium

 

Phenols
0 to 5,000

 

DISTRIBUTION OF POLLUTION SOURCES

The Caribbean Environmental Programme’s (CEP) Technical Report No. 33 is the best resource for a detailed distribution of pollutant loads in the WCR (UNEP 1994). The highest estimated pollutant loads into coastal waters are from Sub-regions I and V, which contribute, respectively, about 2 million and 1 million tonnes of BOD per year. BOD loads from Sub-regions II, III, and IV range from 100,000 to 400,000 tonnes per year for each region. Industrial loading of BOD is 3 to 200 times that of domestic sources in all sub-regions. More detailed information is provided in Tables 9 to 12 of CEP Technical Report No. 33, which are included in Appendix A.

Table 2-2 presents a regional summary of pollutant loads. It can be seen from Table 2-2 that industrial sources account for as much as 80 percent of the pollution load to the Wider Caribbean Basin. Even though domestic sources are a relatively small part of the total current pollution load, control of pollution from domestic sources receives considerable attention in the current report. This is because domestic sources are important in all countries of the WCR (they are ubiquitous), because pollution control from domestic sources is an important element of public education about environmental and public health issues, and because human health risk arises primarily from domestic sewage.

 

TABLE 2-2.
SUMMARY OF POLLUTANT LOADINGS IN THE WIDER CARIBBEAN BASIN
TONNES PER YEAR

Parameter

Subregion I

Subregion II

Subregion III

Subregion
IV

Subregion
V

TOTAL

BOD
Domestic
Industrial


115,656
2,245,762


16,785
126,858


71,079
357,441


4,790
94,707


260,171
603,370


506,482
3,428,138

TSS
Domestic
Industrial


116,327
27,821,848


16,427
149,887


90,214
993,964


4,617
270,270


228,744
2,684,948


456,329
31,920,953

TN
Domestic
Industrial


34,070
17,234


2,419
40,526


5,239
43,265


710
37,306


86,338
211,107


128,786
349,435

TP
Domestic
Industrial


19,141
17,717


1,467
4,519


5,503
12,690


531
15,171


33,475
32,537


60,117
82,634

Oil & Grease
Domestic
Industrial


41,370
640,181


2,001
8,611


6,089
128,024


504
41,227


18,975
162,608


68,939
908,701

Reference: CEP Technical Report No. 33

SEWAGE TREATMENT GOALS

The primary purpose of sewage treatment is to remove pollutants from wastewater streams before disposal into receiving waters including:

 

A secondary purpose of sewage treatment is to treat and dispose of the solids, or sludge, generated by the treatment processes. For sewage from industrial sources, special attention must be given to removal of toxic substances.

CURRENT PRACTICES and EFFECTS

Resources cited in the literature review provide detailed information about current practices and the condition of sewage treatment in the WCR. UNEP-CAR/RCU, the Caribbean Environmental Health Institute (CEHI), and other organisations and governments in the WCR have funded numerous reports addressing the state of sewage collection and treatment in the region. One study concluded that less than 10 percent of the population in the Caribbean basin is served by sewage treatment.

The effectiveness of existing sewage collection and treatment facilities in the region is usually constrained by limited capacity, poor maintenance, process malfunction, poor maintenance practices, and lack of experienced or properly trained staff. Most collection and treatment facilities dispose of their effluent and wastes directly into the marine environment, resulting in high coliform concentrations and low dissolved oxygen levels in coastal waters.

In rural areas of the WCR, collection systems are rarely used, and pit privies, latrines, or septic tanks are the most common waste disposal systems. These processes can be effective, provided they are designed, installed, maintained, and used properly. The biggest problem with them is lack of maintenance. Septic tanks, pit latrines, and pit privies need to be cleaned ("desludged") periodically. Failure to desludge results in poor effluent quality. Also, septic tanks with soil absorption for effluent disposal work poorly if the soil is not very permeable, or if ground water levels are high.

In areas of higher population density, it is feasible to develop a local collection system and use a single facility to treat the community’s wastes. Lagoons, stabilisation ponds, and aerobic package plants are common treatment options for mid-size communities in the WCR. Lagoons are often appropriate, but they require a large area to provide adequate treatment. Package plants are used mostly for resort communities, hotels, and other public buildings. Many package plants in the WCR are operating improperly because of improper design and inadequate maintenance. In centralised, urban centres, lagoons, package plants, and conventional activated sludge systems are used. Many of these treatment facilities do not provide adequate treatment because of improper maintenance, and lack of skilled operators. A report by CEHI and the Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO) described the following disposal practices for systems in the WCR that collect and treat sewage (Bartone, 1984) :

• 21 percent reuse effluent.

• 14 percent practice subsurface discharge.

• 28 percent use marine disposal, mainly on shoreline.

• 22 percent discharge to surface waters such as lagoons or streams.

• 14 percent practice on-site disposal.

 

The percentages do not sum to 100 in the original.

Poor sewage treatment and disposal affects the health of the local population and the environment. In St. Lucia, children have been affected by helminths. In Barbados, extremely high coliform counts have been measured. In Colombia and the United States bordering the Gulf of Mexico, sewage pollution has been identified as the cause of fish kills. And in Cuba, impacts of sewage pollution have been measured as far as 1 kilometre from sewage effluent discharge points. According to PAHO data, as of 1979, enteric and diarrhoeal diseases are the most common cause of infant mortality in many Latin America and Caribbean countries.

Problems with less severe consequences include pollution of tourist and bathing beaches and pollution impacts on the marine environment. Problems associated with poor disposal practices are high coliform counts in coastal waters, eutrophication in bays and harbours, damage to coral reefs, and fish kills or abiotic waters in the most extreme instances. Fish kills occur from oxygen depletion due to the high BOD. Table 2-2 summarises sewage collection and treatment practices in the WCR and their effects on the environment. Data in Table 2-2 were derived from a report on a seminar entitled "Monitoring and Control of Sanitary Quality of Bathing and Shellfish-Growing Waters in the Wider Caribbean," held in Kingston, Jamaica in 1991. (CEPPOL. 1991) The CEPPOL report includes the disclaimer that "the information was extracted from a variety of reports, some of which were prepared in the early 1980’s and for which no more up-to-date information was available. For some countries, information was not available at all and therefore, these have not been included in the report. As a result, the report may not accurately reflect the actual status of sewage pollution in the region, nor the existing monitoring programmes and implemented control measures." Where KCM had specific knowledge of new data, this new data was used to update the table.

 

 

 

 

TABLE 2-3.
SEWAGE COLLECTION AND TREATMENT PRACTICES AND EFFECTS IN THE WCR


Country
Degree of Collection Degree of Treatment/
Type of Treatment Prevalent

Problems
Monitoring Programs
and Standards
Bahamas 15.6% of population Deep well injection of raw sewage; 44% of sewage treatment works (STW) are in poor condition or non-operational High incidence of gastro-enteritis Department of Environmental Health conducts random sampling of coastal waters; Twice monthly sampling to begin; WHO and U.S. EPA standards currently used
British
Virgin Islands
1 collection system Pumping of raw sewage to marine outfall; some septic tanks Some wastes return to shoreline, ground water pollution problems Permanent program being established; monthly sampling of total (TC) and faecal (FC) coliforms in bays. U.S. EPA standard of 200 FC/100 mL and 1000 TC/100 mL
Dominica 13.5% of population Raw sewage, septage, and effluent disposal into rivers and ocean; virtually non-existent treatment High incidence of water borne diseases—65 cases typhoid in 1982  
St. Lucia 13.2% of population. Treatment facility in Rodney Bay Usually untreated raw sewage discharged into ocean & inner harbours; 54% STW are in poor condition or non-operational High bacterial levels in some coastal areas Random sampling of coastal waters conducted by the Ministry of Health in co-operation with CEHI
Trinidad
& Tobago
Most of population serviced Lagoons, trickling filters, activated sludge; oxidation ditches; package plants; discharge into estuaries and rivers; 46% in poor condition or non-operational Poor maintenance practices; high coastal bacterial counts. Rivers of poor water quality. Institute of Marine Affairs conducts surveys to assess quality of bathing. No legally declared standards yet, but EMA, CEHI, and Trinidad & Tobago Bureau of Standards developing them now.
Montserrat Virtually none, only 1 STW Septic tanks with soil absorption fields (volcanic sandy loam provides good treatment) Inadequate for large developments; otherwise few problems  
Barbados 10% - only for Bridgetown, South Coast system under construction STW for Bridgetown, outfall for South Coast, remainder of island - septic tanks and soakaway pits or suck wells. Few package plants at hotels. Nutrients in coastal zone impacting coral reefs. High coliform counts in some coastal areas. Coastal Zone Management Unit & Environmental Engineering Unit monitor swimming areas for faecal coliform.
Grenada 1 for city of St. George Virtually no treatment in some areas; about 60% STW in okay condition Pollution at Grand Anse Bay  
Guadeloupe (France)   Oxidation ponds   Sanitary quality of bathing waters assessed on a regular basis and before each tourist season. Maps issued to describe water quality. EEC guidelines of 1976 used
St. Vincent 6% - only for City of Kingstown Kingstown has preliminary treatment and outfall. Most of island uses septic tanks and poor quality absorption pits or fields. Few package plants at hotels. Impervious soils and high water table in coastal zone causes overflowing of absorption fields. None

 

 

 

TABLE 2-3 (continued).
SEWAGE COLLECTION AND TREATMENT PRACTICES AND EFFECTS IN THE WCR


Country
Degree of Collection Degree of Treatment/
Type of Treatment Prevalent

Problems
Monitoring Programs
and Standards
Antigua & Barbuda Mostly for hotels Numerous hotel package plants; 48% in poor condition or non-operational; septic tank effluent directly to sea   Random sampling by Ministry of Health with CEHI; Emphasis on potable water quality; WHO standards used mainly
St. Kitts - Nevis Mostly for hotels and hospitals A few package plants, most in decent condition; the remainder use septic tanks No serious problems, but some septic tank effluent saturation Random sampling of coastal waters conducted by the Ministry of Health in co-operation with CEHI
Belize Very little; new system being built for Belize City Aerated lagoons before ocean outfall; high water table encourages draining septic tank effluent directly to canals and ocean for fear of contaminating drinking water supplies High coliform counts in coastal waters  
Colombia 25% of coastal population Very little treatment Enteritis, hepatitis, and typhoid fevers; eutrophication in harbours Regular sampling and analysis in a few area, such as Cartagena Bay. Very developed environmental legislation, set standards for faecal coliforms, and waste water effluents for new & existing plants.
Cayman Islands System built in 1988 Stabilisation ponds outfall   Government agencies jointly monitor coastal water quality (total, faecal coliforms & Enteroc...). EEC & WHO standards currently used. Comprehensive surveys carried out in identified pollutant areas.
Costa Rica   Limon discharges raw sewage into harbour No major problems except coliform count near Limon discharge No regular program is known to exist. Studies of coastal waters have found total coliforms (TC) to be twice that of faecal coliforms (FC). In U.S., more common values of TC:FC are 5:1
Cuba     Problems concentrated in Havana with faecal coliforms Ministry of Public Health is in charge of ensuring compliance with standards. Regular monitoring program in place. Standards and guidelines adopted from international organisations & European countries.
Dominican Republic 25% of urban population
(in 1979)
Sewage discharge into sea    
Guatemala   At least 27 treatment facilities - Imhoff tanks, lagoons, trickling filters, and activated sludge. Many treatment facilities impaired due to poor design, lack of spares, and shortage of qualified operators.  

TABLE 2-3 (continued).
SEWAGE COLLECTION AND TREATMENT PRACTICES AND EFFECTS IN THE WCR


Country
Degree of Collection Degree of Treatment/
Type of Treatment Prevalent

Problems
Monitoring Programs
and Standards
Haiti None 40% population (mostly urban) uses latrines and septic tanks; 41% urban + 12% rural have acceptable disposal means 80-90% septage and latrine solids dumped into rivers and sea illegally Human waste disposal is most pressing problem  
Honduras No data.      
Jamaica   109 STW; 21 serve Kingston area; however not enough capacity; 8-10 mgd of inadequately treated sewage is discharged into Kingston harbour; 25% STW are in poor condition or are non-operational Coastal waters are abiotic There is monitoring of sewage and discharge limits for sewage treatment plants. However, no documentation if regular monitoring of coastal waters is conducted.
Mexico   Commonly discharge into rivers; in Cancun, sewage collected and discharged into lagoon Abiotic conditions near urban centres Monitoring program or practices not known. Minimum water quality levels are required for various water uses, such as bathing or shellfish growing.
Panama 6 sewer systems serve 95% of coastal population 4 have primary treatment (10% of coastal population); 2 systems discharge raw sewage (85% of coastal population)   No information available on monitoring programs. Water quality criteria recently adopted based on WHO/PAHO standards.
Gulf of Mexico, U.S. 460 municipalities discharge Majority receive secondary treatment or better; 10% have only primary treatment; more than 1 billion gallons per day Some malfunctioning septic systems, particularly in Louisiana and Florida Oxygen depletion in areas has caused fish kills due to marine growths National monitoring, assessment, and control system in place for all coastal states. US/NOAA program determines national inventory on pollutants discharged into coastal waters. EPA, FDA, etc.
Puerto Rico        
U.S. Virgin Islands        
Venezuela 65% served 3% of population served by sewage treatment - mainly on Margarita Island. Projects under construction for Valencia and Maracaibo. No municipal treatment for Caracas and other major cities. Significant industrial load. Oxygen depletion and coliform contamination of rivers. Monitoring and compliance programs are implemented. National standards for coastal water quality criteria developed in 1983 based on EEC, WHO, and U.S. EPA guidelines.

 

 

 

CURRENT WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

Sources upon which water quality standards can be based include extensive studies on the effects of pollution in receiving waters as well as existing standards from other countries or states. Most countries in the WCR use microbiological water quality standards taken from U.S. EPA guidelines written prior to 1986. However, these standards often are too stringent and expensive for a developing nation. Planners need to account for the economic realities and development priorities of developing nations when setting water quality standards.

Three general categories of microbiological water quality standards are based on intended water uses: protection of indigenous organisms, primary contact recreation, and shellfish harvesting. For developing countries, the pollutants of greatest concern are pathogens because they pose an immediate health danger. The most stringent requirements are those for shellfish harvesting, since some shellfish tend to concentrate contaminants. The UNEP/World Health Organisation (WHO) standard for shellfish harvesting waters is a maximum of 10 faecal coliforms per 100 mL for 80 percent of samples taken. Shellfish contamination is associated with typhoid fever, cholera, viral hepatitis, and many other gastro-enteric conditions.

Currently, the UNEP-CAR/RCU, CEHI, Trinidad’s Environmental Management Authority (EMA), and other Caribbean agencies are working to develop water quality standards for other pollutants from domestic and industrial sewage. Water quality criteria have been proposed for BOD, TSS, nitrogen, phosphorus, pH, temperature, oil and grease, and bacteria. Standards from the United States and other countries are provided in Appendix B.

 

 

Top of Page


Chapter 1. | Chapter 2. | Chapter 3. | Chapter 4. | Chapter 5. | Chapter 6. | Chapter 7. | References | Appendix A.  | Appendix B. | Appendix C. | Appendix D. | Appendix E.


Report Contents

Last Updated: